Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 27(6): 1122-1129, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36859605

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of the Critical View of Safety approach in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, exposure of the common bile duct, and common hepatic duct is not recommended, therefore, the length of the cystic duct remnant is no longer controlled. The aim of this case‒control study is to evaluate the relationship between the length of the cystic duct remnant and the risk for bile duct stone recurrence after cholecystectomy. METHODS: All MRIs with dedicated sequences of the biliary tract taken between 2010 and 2020 from patients who underwent prior cholecystectomy were reviewed. The length of the cystic duct remnant was measured and compared between the patients with and without bile duct stones using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 362 patients were included in this study, 23.5% of whom had bile duct stones on MRI. The cystic duct remnant was significantly longer in the patients with stones than in the control group (median 31 mm versus 18 mm, P < 0.001). In the MRIs performed > 2 years after cholecystectomy, the cystic duct remnant was also significantly longer in the patients with bile duct stones (median 32 mm versus 21 mm, P < 0.001). A cystic duct remnant ≥ 15 mm in length increased the odds of stones (OR = 2.3, P = 0.001). Overall, the odds of bile duct stones increased with an increasing cystic duct remnant length (≥ 45 mm, OR = 5.0, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: An excessive cystic duct remnant length increases the odds of recurrent bile duct stones after cholecystectomy.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Cálculos Biliares , Humanos , Ducto Cístico/diagnóstico por imagem , Ducto Cístico/cirurgia , Cálculos Biliares/cirurgia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Ducto Colédoco/cirurgia , Colecistectomia/efeitos adversos , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/efeitos adversos
2.
BMC Surg ; 23(1): 3, 2023 Jan 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36611137

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: With increasing use and enhanced accuracy of cross-sectional imaging, the diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas has increased over the last few decades. The extent to which malignant transformation occurs remains unclear, making the management of IPMNs controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the progression rate and outcome of follow-up in patients with IPMNs. METHODS: A database of all patients diagnosed with IPMN at the Cantonal Hospital HFR Fribourg, Switzerland, between January 2006 and December 2019 with a follow-up of at least 6 months was analyzed retrospectively. Descriptive statistics were performed on patient demographics, IPMN characteristics, and follow-up data. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients were included in this study. Ten patients underwent primary surgery, 46 were enrolled in a surveillance program.21.7% (n = 5) of patients under surveillance presented with worrisome features of IPMN; progression rates were significantly higher in these patients (p = 0.043). Most progression occurred in the early follow-up period. Five patients underwent surgery due to progression, of which 2 presented high-grade dysplasia and 2 malignancy on postoperative histology. CONCLUSIONS: The limited predictive value of current guidelines may lead to surgical overtreatment, and the decision to proceed with surgical resection should be made with caution. Further prospective analyses and the development of novel biomarkers are needed to better understand the natural history of IPMN and improve diagnostic precision.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirurgia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patologia , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia
3.
PLoS One ; 16(6): e0252397, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34138876

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is a highly lethal disease with increasing incidence. Due to high resistance, chemo/radiotherapy has limited success in pancreatic cancer and only marginally prolongs patient survival. Therefore, novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets are needed. In the present review, we performed a comprehensive summary of therapeutic approaches targeting the GP130/JAK/STAT3 pathway. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the PubMed and Embase databases for preclinical and clinical studies, from inception to October 4, 2020, on drugs targeting the GP130/JAK/STAT3 pathway. Bias assessments and qualitative analyses were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-five preclinical and nine clinical trials were included in the review. All preclinical studies reported a favorable outcome in terms of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression. Futhermore, drugs targeting the GP130/JAK/STAT3 pathway were shown to be efficient chemosensitizers. However, high publication bias was assumed. In the clinical setting, bazedoxifene and itacitinib improved patient outcomes. CONCLUSION: Preclinical studies strongly suggest significant efficacy of drugs targeting GP130/JAK/STAT3 in the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and that these molecules are effective chemosensitizers. Though only a few trials have shown the efficacy in a clinical setting, the STAT3 pathway remains a promising drug target for future treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and may help overcome chemotherapy resistance.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/metabolismo , Fator de Transcrição STAT3/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Animais , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia
4.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 36(9): 1995-2005, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33839889

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Appendectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgeries worldwide, but neurogenic appendicopathy (NA) remains a poorly understood disease with controversial clinical management. The aim of this review was to obtain a clear definition of the disease and summarize its management. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature on NA in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from inception to 19/01/2021 according to PRISMA statement standards. Eligibility criteria were original articles examining histopathology, clinical management, and/or follow-up of patients with NA. The literature review is complemented by a clinical case. RESULTS: In 40 articles, the estimated incidence of NA among appendectomies performed in patients with a suspicion of acute appendicitis (AA) was 10.4% (N = 740, range 1.8-32%). NA more frequently causes recurrent and longer lasting pain compared to AA; however, these diseases are usually not clinically or radiologically distinguishable. Based on our analysis, NA is defined as the presence of three criteria: (1) clinical presentation of AA, (2) absence of acute inflammation on histopathology, and (3) presence of S-100-positive spindle cells or proliferation of Schwann cells. Laparoscopic appendectomy has been shown to be a safe and successful treatment. CONCLUSIONS: NA is a poorly known disease, which may clinically appear as AA but is often related to recurrent and longer lasting abdominal pain. Patients with NA may suffer for years before diagnosis. In cases of typical symptoms, appendectomy should be performed even in cases of macroscopically and radiologically normal-appearing appendices with normal laboratory results.


Assuntos
Apendicite , Apêndice , Laparoscopia , Doença Aguda , Apendicectomia , Apendicite/complicações , Apendicite/diagnóstico , Apendicite/cirurgia , Apêndice/cirurgia , Humanos , Incidência
5.
BMC Cancer ; 19(1): 469, 2019 May 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31101028

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer screening mammography is widespread in industrialised countries within the framework of public health program or opportunist form. Only few data exist on the comparison of effectiveness between organised and opportunistic screening. The aim of this study is to compare organised and opportunistic screening using population-based data from the Fribourg cancer registry, Switzerland. METHODS: We included all first primary breast adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 2006 and 2014 in women aged 50-69 years resident in the canton of Fribourg. We considered only breast cancer discovered by mammography screening. We compared patients, tumour characteristics and treatment modalities between breast cancer detected by the organised screening program versus opportunistic screening using logistic regression. RESULTS: Out of 989 patients diagnosed with breast cancer, 402 (40.6%) were diagnosed by organised and 205 (20.7%) by opportunistic screening. Women with breast cancer detected within the screening program were more likely to be from rural areas (P = 0.035) and lived less frequently in high favoured regions (P = 0.020). They presented more frequently in situ than invasive cancer (P = 0.022). For patients with invasive breast cancer, those detected by the program were less likely to undergo mastectomy (P = 0.06) and consequently, they were more likely to undergo radiation therapy (P = 0.003). Adjustment for area of residence and financial context of the region did not modify the results presented. CONCLUSIONS: The present study reports an increased rate of detection of carcinoma in situ in organised screening program as compared to opportunistic screening mammographies, an indirect evidence of a higher radiologic sensitivity. Furthermore, the results show a trend towards more mastectomies among patients with breast cancer discovered after opportunistic than after organized mammography screening, reflecting lower treatment burden. Those results were independent of socio-economic factors which differed across screening groups.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Idoso , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Humanos , Mamografia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Suíça
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...